The Last Airbender (2010)
The Last Airbender
”A young Avatar must master all elements to stop the Fire Nation from enslaving nations.”
Available at home
Subscription
Rent or Buy
&plat_logo=https://media.filmelier.com/images/plataformas/icone_mobile/365599cc6c68bb404af36411d40a866c.png&link=https%3A%2F%2Fitunes.apple.com%2Fus%2Fmovie%2Fthe-last-airbender%2Fid384239910%3Fat%3D1000loWU "Apple TV (iTunes)")
Trailer
Why watch this film?
After a series of low-budget films that became a hit with both audiences and critics, such as 'Signs' and 'The Sixth Sense', filmmaker M. Night Shyamalan ventured into blockbusters with 'The Last Airbender', an adaptation of the animated series 'Avatar: The Legend of Aang'. And even though the movie has become one of the biggest failures of the director's career, both with audiences and critics, it is interesting to observe the style and particular narrative of Shyamalan in this interpretation of the cartoon. There are mysterious characters, narrative layers that emerge and some small twists. Of course, it's not a good movie - there are plot holes, embarrassing moments and a lot of things badly explained. But it's interesting to watch to understand this other side of the filmmaker, with special effects and more budget, and to peek into how the 'Avatar' universe jumps onto the big screen.
Filmelier
Our suggestions
Plot summary
Follows the adventures of Aang, a young successor to a long line of Avatars, who must master all four elements and stop the Fire Nation from enslaving the Water Tribes and the Earth Kingdom.
To share
Do you want to watch something different?
Watch full movies now!
Press play and be surprised!
Where to watch?
Available at home
From the same director
Signs
After surprising the world with the twist ending of 'The Sixth Sense' and thrilling with 'Unbreakable', filmmaker M. Night Shyamalan decided to dedicate himself to aliens in the very entertaining 'Signs'. Already considered a classic by some, the feature film plays with the protagonist's (Mel Gibson, in one of his best roles of his career) paranoia atmosphere to somehow also provoke and challenge the viewer. The familiar atmosphere of the plot, reminiscent of Steven Spielberg's productions of yesteryear, helps to set the tone. But the best part is the suspense, created from a possible alien invasion on Earth. It's hard not to get excited, scared and even afraid, at times, to keep your foot out of the blanket. One of the milestones of Shyamalan's career and, without a doubt, one of the most fun (and scary) films to celebrate alien invasions.
Glass
M. Night Shyamalan’s cinematic odyssey concludes with ‘Glass’, the third installment of what has been called the 'Eastrail 177 Trilogy', starting in 2000 with ‘Unbreakable’ and continuing 16 years later with ‘Split’. 'Glass' is the most ambitious of the three, deconstructing comic book tropes into a superhero movie. James McAvoy shines again, playing the 20 distinct characters. Samuel L. Jackson also stars. Unfortunately, the director’s trademark twists and turns at the end are overly convoluted, which has earned negative reviews from critics. Nevertheless, the movie has plenty of positives - a sure-fire satisfaction for superhero fans.
Unbreakable
Originally released in 2000, 'Unbreakable' is like wine: it has aged well. At the time of its release, the feature film suffered from negative opinions, largely due to its mix of thriller, psychological drama, and comic books - something that was not very well understood by the public and critics. Over the years, with reruns on TV, it gained cult status, especially with the help of younger viewers, who have grown up in a world dominated by superhero movies and series. With a surprising ending - a characteristic of director M. Night Shyamalan's work (of 'The Sixth Sense') - 'Unbreakable' ended up giving birth to a new universe of fiction, which would be explored again in the feature films 'Split' and 'Glass'.
Split
"Fragmented" is a powerful, strong, and scary horror movie - but without relying on gore or jump scares. What really torments us are the 23 personalities of its protagonist, echoing real monsters that exist in our society. James McAvoy also terrifies with an exceptional performance. And the surprise ending, a trademark of the filmmaker, not only is there but opens doors to a new movie, 'Glass'. Obviously it's not a movie for everyone, but it will satisfy those who want to be surprised with something different than usual.
After Earth
Movie that became practically a watershed in M. Night Shyamalan's career. After all, after 'The Sixth Sense' and 'Signs', the filmmaker delivered this movie that disappointed specialized critics. However, it is not possible to say that 'After Earth' is a total fiasco. The feature film, starring Jaden Smith and featuring his father, Will Smith, tells the story of a father and son who suffer an accident in a spaceship. As a result, the young man has to go out in search of a beacon to get out of an inhospitable planet. It is not a great movie, nor does it have the sagacity of Shyamalan that we have seen in other productions. But, of course, you can turn off the switch and spend some time with this space adventure, even though Jaden's little charisma harms the movie.
The Visit
After making a success with movies such as 'Signs' and 'The Sixth Sense', filmmaker M. Night Shyamalan entered a really bad moment in his career. He signed off on bombs like 'The Happening', 'The Last Airbender' and 'After Earth'. So, Shyamalan took the correct path. He put the ball down, asked for a timeout and took a good break. The result of this respite for the filmmaker is the interesting 'The Visit', a "comeback" movie from Shyamalan. Here, through found footage -- that is, hand-held camera, as if a character was filming the whole film -- we follow the vacations of two siblings at their grandparents' house. However, quickly, things get out of control and the grandparents show they are not who they should be. The highlight goes to the scary performances of Peter McRobbie and Deanna Dunagan as the grandparents, in addition to the good comedic relief from grandson Ed Oxenbould.
Knock at the Cabin
One of the most recurring themes in director M. Night Shyamalan's career (renowned for 'The Sixth Sense' and 'Signs') is the confrontation with faith, putting his protagonists to the test. In 'Knock at the Cabin', the director returns to this theme, even though it is a borrowed story (the movie's script is adapted from Paul Tremblay's book 'The Cabin at the End of the World'). The director appropriates the story very well, which fits naturally into his filmography. We then have an apocalypse story, but reduced to a family microcosm, where we follow only a small number of characters facing the unfolding of an unthinkable tragedy. The direction is punctual, with a limiting and claustrophobic camera that conveys the tension of the events, and a meticulously calculated body performance. The narrative development is also very interesting, as the great conflict is already presented in the first minutes of the movie, and leads the story in a well-defined way, without hesitation or losing tension. The greatest brilliance, however, is from the cast, who are in great harmony. The invading group is led by Dave Bautista ('Guardians of the Galaxy'), who is brilliant here in a very different role, showing that he has huge potential for productions beyond his physical stereotype. Rupert Grint (the beloved Ron Weasley from 'Harry Potter' also makes an appearance, leaving us wanting to see him in more projects. It is a classic Shyamalan movie, so it is expected to cause some division in general opinions, but it can also be said that this is a more punctual movie from the director, which will probably please those who buy its initial premise.
Old
M. Night Shyamalan is a controversial filmmaker. After all, he doesn't please everyone due to his style and, mainly, the instability of his works--he has "modern classics" like 'The Sixth Sense' and 'Signs', cults like 'The Lady in the Water' and the flops 'The Last Airbender' and 'After Earth'. 'Old' does not reach disaster. But it's not good either. The feature tells the story of a group of people who, on vacation at a resort, go for a walk on a deserted, paradisiacal beach. The main nucleus is a family formed by Gael García Bernal, Vicky Krieps, Alex Wolff and Thomasin McKenzie. There is also a doctor, an elderly woman, a nurse, a rapper and so on. An unusual mix. The business gets strange, however, when the characters realize that time passes differently on that beach. Everything is faster. Seconds are days. Minutes are hours. And hours are years. From then on, the despair of those characters begins to try to escape alive from the beach and before they age too much--the deaths in that place, after all, accumulate. The idea of the narrative, inspired by a comic book signed by Pierre-Oscar Lévy and Frederick Peeters, is the highlight. The tension arises almost naturally when time begins to impose itself. As in other Shyamalan films, themes such as life, spirituality and nature begin to pop up here and there, but the main focus in the story is to develop the tension. The problem is in the unfolding of this story. Firstly, Shyamalan has problems developing the cast's performance. Although the actors strive, it seems that there is a mismatch between the plot and the story. Now, time runs, they age prematurely. And it seems that no one is desperate, no one reacts accordingly there. In addition, all the power of this suspense does not have an appropriate ending: it is rushed and somewhat obvious. However, don't be fooled. It's not a bad movie. It's unstable, it's clumsy. But the tension exists. And Shyamalan can still surprise.
Adventure
The Book of Clarence
Biblical epics in the style of Ben-Hur are so recognizable in classic cinema that they have been the subject of witty parodies (most notably, the also classic Monty Python's Life of Brian). Here, director Jeymes Samuel (The Harder They Fall) filters the conventions of these films through a black lens, with a cast led by names like Lakeith Stanfield, Alfre Woodard, David Oyelowo, Omar Sy, and Anna Diop, among others. The Book of Clarence follows a man who, aspiring to be someone in life, decides to capitalize on the popularity of Jesus of Nazareth for his own benefit. Through the biblical cliché, the film examines issues such as black identity, the distortion of faith by organized religions, and the very sense of goodness and compassion. It's somewhat uneven but nonetheless entertaining.
Metalocalypse: Army of the Doomstar
After the heroic rescue of Toki Wartooth, DETHKLOK frontman Nathan Explosion finds himself traumatized in a BRUTAL professional and romantic flat-spin all while he is tasked with fulfilling the prophecy and confronting the ultimate songwriting challenge: write the SONG OF SALVATION and save the planet. Can Nathan Explosion look beyond his brutally damaged ego to save his band, stop the Metalocalypse, and finally face the ultimate evil: Salacia?
Richard: The Stork
A charming animation full of adventure and vibrant colors in a story about leadership and maturity. The film tells the story of Richard, a brave sparrow adopted by a family of storks, and his journey to find a lost jewel while leading a group of oppressed birds. The sequel maintains the essence of the original, while exploring themes of friendship and self-knowledge, with valuable lessons reminiscent of Disney classics.
Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire
The third official installment in the Ghostbusters saga, Ghostbusters: Afterlife, was a sequel that worked due to its nostalgic and self-referential spirit: it acknowledged the passage of time and the separation of the original group (in front of and behind the cameras), paying homage and passing the torch to a new generation. The sequel seems to throw all that out the window. Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire continues the story of Phoebe Spengler (Mckenna Grace) and her family as the new Ghostbusters, back in New York to fight the paranormal. However, gradually, subplots involving new characters (Kumail Nanjiani is one of the best) as well as others already introduced in the new generation begin to emerge, but there's also a return of almost all the classic characters. The result is an unnecessarily complicated web of subplots and an overload of characters, which ends up diluting the impact of the film's most fun and emotional ideas. It's not a disaster, but it definitely would have worked better if it had embraced the innovative spirit of its predecessor to let go of the past.
